136
136
tv
eye 136
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> the damage it will do to the economy. i don't think the president has a bigger role as he thinks he is. the house will be held by republicans for the foreseeable future, not just two years. midterm elections, six years, sterile for the president. the end of the day he wants a legacy. it's going to be the highest unemployment in history fr two terms it is not careful. he will take us back into recession. if he wants serious negotiations that will sit down and come to some kind of an agreement. we have been down this road before where republicans of given on the taxes. s in the white house with reagan. they promised dollars in cuts. they didn't give us anything. bush went through the same drill when he broke his tax pledge, busch sr. we have had this history beore. basically, tell us what you're going to do. there will be a stimulus by fixing the northeast from the storm. add another 50 billion out there on top of the package. and then the audacity of saying, i'm going to raise the debt ceiling whenever i want to. give me p
. >> the damage it will do to the economy. i don't think the president has a bigger role as he thinks he is. the house will be held by republicans for the foreseeable future, not just two years. midterm elections, six years, sterile for the president. the end of the day he wants a legacy. it's going to be the highest unemployment in history fr two terms it is not careful. he will take us back into recession. if he wants serious negotiations that will sit down and come to some kind of an...
122
122
Nov 29, 2012
11/12
by
FBC
tv
eye 122
favorite 0
quote 0
lou: he did gain control of let's sixth of the economy with the obamacare committed to? i mean, he did pass some subset of regulation of our financial industry in this country. you're not exactly easing concerns, hearts are worried about what the republicans are going to be able to do. by the way, i want to make it very clear. a person who supports entirely the idea of low taxes and maintaining that posture and certainly doing so energetically if there is no quid pro quo, significant order in spending. but what in the world by these folks to do on capitol hill? >> here is my argument. the first thing the republicans need to do is insist that the negotiations be in front of c-span so that the american people can see what obama is and is not doing. until that happens, obama can keep misrepresenting what is going on. second, they need to say %-to be on line for seven daysds said that the american people can read it. we have those two things, the chances of being completely jammed is a greatly reduced, not down to zero, but let's get c-span cameras there. lou: i think your c
lou: he did gain control of let's sixth of the economy with the obamacare committed to? i mean, he did pass some subset of regulation of our financial industry in this country. you're not exactly easing concerns, hearts are worried about what the republicans are going to be able to do. by the way, i want to make it very clear. a person who supports entirely the idea of low taxes and maintaining that posture and certainly doing so energetically if there is no quid pro quo, significant order in...
152
152
Nov 28, 2012
11/12
by
FBC
tv
eye 152
favorite 0
quote 0
not because it's good for the economy. he has a totally noneconomic reason for it and he's serious, we'll tell you what it is next. >> new at 10, warren buffett who has been begging the government to raise taxes on rich people like himself, well, instead of writing a check, he says, we should tax the rich because it will, quote, raise thh morale in the middle glass. he's serious. and all raising taxes on the wealthy may do, the big story of the day, president obama's campaign, holding more meetings on the fiscal cliff instead of real talks with politicians who have to decide this thing. and going on the road and selling the campaign harry reid says no cuts, democrats have cut spending and entitlements already. >> remember, we've already done more and billion dollars worth of cuts and we've already done that and we need to get credit for at that and these negotiations that take place. >> and the president's position, no more cuts, we're talking about it all with this company. sandra smith is here, and charles payne and as a
not because it's good for the economy. he has a totally noneconomic reason for it and he's serious, we'll tell you what it is next. >> new at 10, warren buffett who has been begging the government to raise taxes on rich people like himself, well, instead of writing a check, he says, we should tax the rich because it will, quote, raise thh morale in the middle glass. he's serious. and all raising taxes on the wealthy may do, the big story of the day, president obama's campaign, holding...
120
120
Nov 30, 2012
11/12
by
FBC
tv
eye 120
favorite 0
quote 0
what would this plant to for our economy? slowdown even more guaranteed, raise the unemployment rate, make us even more like europe. this tax, spend and borrow plan will not give america the growth we so desperately need. consider the timing. right now we have 8% unemployment, less than 3% growth and trillion dollar deficit every year. we are spending $9 billion a week in interest in the death. imposing those tax hikes now is simply bad economic policy, taking all restraints off of borrowing caused disaster. we need 5% growth. we are not going to get it like this. yet again president obama is reviewing his inner self. he is driven by a hard left ideology. take from this group, redistribute, government is everything. clearly the president is good at politics. he won the election but lousy economics. prosperity is not coming back anytime soon. [ male announcer ] where do you turn for legal matters? at legalzoom, we've created a better place to handle your legal needs. maybe you have questions about incorporating a business you'
what would this plant to for our economy? slowdown even more guaranteed, raise the unemployment rate, make us even more like europe. this tax, spend and borrow plan will not give america the growth we so desperately need. consider the timing. right now we have 8% unemployment, less than 3% growth and trillion dollar deficit every year. we are spending $9 billion a week in interest in the death. imposing those tax hikes now is simply bad economic policy, taking all restraints off of borrowing...
210
210
tv
eye 210
favorite 0
quote 0
if we raise taxes wickets ithe economy into a tailspin. lou: you know, the choice, as i said, in terms of consequences for the polical or economic lle severe. i want to credit. i don't know if you rad his pie entitled the gop, the party of slightly fewer tax hikes. this has to be a carefully managed, if youwill be the mouthpiece of political choreography becausepublican party right now, the party o free enterise and individual freedom, self-reliance, and lower taxes andsmaller government is on the vergeof giving up it claims on lower taxes, smaller government, and, perhaps, peraps migrated dependency, less iindividual eedom and self-liance. it gives no much for the party to cling to politically. lou:here is the thing. the facts are actually on our side. when bush cut the taxrates i 2003, do you know what happened? more reenue. th percentage of that revenue. >> adelle want to give the full answer t this. we saw the sloest jo ceation. it was on match by the procession of 2008 and nine. this is such a complicated economy, as you know as well
if we raise taxes wickets ithe economy into a tailspin. lou: you know, the choice, as i said, in terms of consequences for the polical or economic lle severe. i want to credit. i don't know if you rad his pie entitled the gop, the party of slightly fewer tax hikes. this has to be a carefully managed, if youwill be the mouthpiece of political choreography becausepublican party right now, the party o free enterise and individual freedom, self-reliance, and lower taxes andsmaller government is on...